[!CrackMonkey!] Ogg Vorbis vs. MP3 (was Re: on pigdog)
sneakums at zork.net
Sat Sep 28 11:33:49 PDT 2002
commence Matt Obert quotation:
> The Archduke of Chicago and Subjugator of Michigan <inkblot at movealong.org> looked into the void, and said:
>> So far I've just been a passive observer in this thread. I apologize
>> in advance if I misrepresent what anyone has written, but I believe
>> this is an accurate diagram of most if not all of the jokes that have
>> been made since the thread stopped being about Thom or Ogg Vorbis vs.
>> "Penis" --> "Ha ha"
> I'd just like to add that MP3 compression sounds glassy in the
> treble range and inconsistent in the bass, while Ogg Vorbis offers
> more solid bass and clearer treble. The Ogg Vorbis compression
> algorithm is also more efficient, so a similar quality .ogg will
> have a smaller file size than the equivalent .mp3 (and a similar
> size .ogg will have higher fidelity.) Plus, Ogg Vorbis is free of
> patent restrictions. This thread is going nowhere fast. I'd love
> to hear some well-documented reasons why MP3s are superior ... and
> failing that, I'd like a pony..
I'm sure Dr. Whee can easily refute your ill-founded and
[|] Sean Neakums | Questions are a burden to others;
[|] <sneakums at zork.net> | answers a prison for oneself.
More information about the Crackmonkey