a-ericra at microsoft.com
Mon Apr 24 15:59:43 PDT 2000
> > This is the part where you identify systems available circa
> > 1995 with better LFN implementations for FAT16 volumes that also
> > retained backwards compatibility.
> Wrong question. Which part of "Y'all should have migrated to HPFS"
> remains unclear?
For the extremely small market of Windows users who wanted to
do the Right Thing as early as 1995, there was NT.
More information about the Crackmonkey