[CrackMonkey] [mailman-owner@zork.net: CrackMonkey SubscribeNotification]

[Mike Goldman]

Deirdre Saoirse wrote:

> > okay, since that happened now, it is a sale, right?  What about after
> > they are married?  Would it be fair use of common property?  Or only
> > if he used half of them?
>
> I believe since he would have owned the asset prior to marriage, that it
> would still be "his." Any difference in value during marriage however,
> would be joint (as I understand these things).

Ah.  I see.  So you smoke it?